[Bug 178709] Review Request: freehdl : GPLed free VHDL

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: freehdl : GPLed free VHDL


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178709





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2006-01-26 01:40 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> Thanks all.
> New version : 
> Spec Name or Url: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.tanguy/freehdl.spec
> SRPM Name or Url: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.tanguy/freehdl-0.0.1-1.src.rpm
> 
>  rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/freehdl-0.0.1-1.i386.rpm
> W: freehdl devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfreehdl-cdfggen.so
...
> W: freehdl devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/freehdl/fire.h
> 
> I think it's not relevant with this package.
What makes you think so? I disagree on this.
If these files are host development files (very likely), then they should go to
a *-devel package, if these files are target development files they are
miss-places. I'd suggest you to implement a *-devel package.

Besides this, there are further minor issues:
* freehdl-config --cxxflags returns -I/usr/include
* freehdl-config --ldflags returns -L/usr/lib
* Some of the doc files aren't utf-8 nor asci encoded (German umlauts, probably
iso8859-1 or iso8859-15 encoded).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.