Some comments about FE-ACCEPT'ed packages
Christian.Iseli at licr.org
Christian.Iseli at licr.org
Fri Jan 27 16:07:02 UTC 2006
Hi all,
I whipped up a small Perl script to analyze FE-ACCEPT'ed packages. Here are
the raw conclusions so far:
---
We have 18 accepted, closed packages where I'm unable to find
the package in the development repo:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=165488,168185,171601,172136,172144,172150,172151,173216,173548,173549,173550,173552,173553,173661,174266,175848,176467,177083
We have 434 accepted, closed package reviews
Top 10 packagers:
tcallawa at redhat dot com : 43
rc040203 at freenet dot de : 41
andreas dot bierfert at lowlatency.de : 28
jpo at di dot uminho.pt : 22
fedora dot wickert at arcor.de : 18
rdieter at math dot unl.edu : 14
orion at cora dot nwra.com : 13
pertusus at free dot fr : 13
paul at city-fan dot org : 11
ivazquez at ivazquez dot net : 11
Top 10 reviewers:
paul at city-fan dot org : 62
gauret at free dot fr : 58
gdk at redhat dot com : 33
tcallawa at redhat dot com : 24
jpmahowald at gmail dot com : 24
rc040203 at freenet dot de : 22
jpo at di dot uminho.pt : 19
adrian at lisas dot de : 18
ed at eh3 dot com : 18
ville dot skytta at iki.fi : 13
We have 9 accepted, open package reviews where the package
appears to already be in the repo...
All open packages already available:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=166207,166251,166252,166253,166254,168905,171334,171336,177166
---
I suspect gdk's good score as a reviewer stems from the fact that some
reviewers forget to assign the bugs to themselves...
If people could have a quick look at the bug lists and:
- close the tickets where teh package is available in the repo
- ponder why their package is not in the devel repo in the other cases
I guess that'd be nice :-)
Cheers,
Christian
P.S. I'm happy to put my (very blunt) script somewhere, but I'm not sure where
would be the most appropriate...
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list