FESCo Election Results

[seth vidal]

On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 22:21 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 06:14:35PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> > >Also I question the "Vote for no more than 13" limit. Approval voting
> > >systems don't usually place a limit.
> > +1
> > I think a lot of people felt they had to vote for 13 members and voted
> > for people they were unsure about just to fill the 13 number.  By not
> > having any limit it is clear to voters that they can vote on as many
> > or as few people as they like.  Voting for every member would be the
> > same as not voting at all.
> 
> If we're going to get all fancy, I'd kind of like to see a "Yes/No/No
> Opinion" choice. As it is, it's not clear from the lack of a checkmark if I
> don't care or if I TOTALLY HATE THEM because they don't put version numbers
> in their changelogs. *
> 
> 
> 
> *   :)

you're just lucky I decided to step aside from my duly elected position
- otherwise there'd be a new MUST in the guidelines something like:
MUST sign up mattdm at mattdm.org for a new spam list before package can be
approved.

-sv