Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
Jeremy Katz
katzj at redhat.com
Tue Jul 11 02:24:27 UTC 2006
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 15:32 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bill Nottingham (notting at redhat.com) said:
> > 4. if there are diffs, move the package to holding
> > 5. A) if the diffs are innocuous -> 'waive' the diffs, build is moved. Optionally,
> > reference files are updated
> > B) they expose a problem -> build is thrown away
>
> Even better if you do more tests versus the current build of the package, such
> as added/removed deps, changed sonames, loss of execshield protection, etc.
Don't forget checking for multilib conflicts[1] :)
Jeremy
[1] Simple stupid script attached
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: multilib-cmp.py
Type: text/x-python
Size: 3413 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060710/2fb3bbb9/attachment.py>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list