Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-07-22

[Jarod Wilson]

On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 08:58 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> I'm Bcc'ing everyone whose email shows up for a package below this
> time, as the time for manditory package fixing is drawing near, per
> the note to fedora-maintainers.  If you haven't looked at your
> packages in a while, and they fail to build in the reduced chroot, now
> would be a good time to take a look.
> Thanks,
> Matt
> 
> Extras Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 Sat Jul 22 02:21:07 CDT 2006
> 
> Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot as
> compared to the standard Fedora Extras build system before FC6test1.  See
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more
> information, including the list of packages removed from the
> default build chroot.
[...]
> Number failed to build: 175
> Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 2
> Leaving:  173
> (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
> 
> Of those expected to have worked...
> Without a bug filed: 153
> ----------------------------------
[...]
> powerman-1.0.24-1.fc6	jwilson at redhat.com
[...]

Fixed, just built 1.0.24-2.fc6. (Needed BR: flex and bison)

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson at redhat.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060724/b99f0b0a/attachment.sig>