next FESCo meeting agenda.

[Michael J. Knox]

Paul wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 19:27 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote:
>> Can this proposed policy be discussed in the next FESCo meeting?
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MikeKnox/AWOL_Policy
>>
>> There has been no (apparent) opposition to the policy.
> 
> The only thing that looks slightly amiss is this
> 
> "- If you are a not an existing Extras contributor, you can still take
> over a package. All of the above must be followed. When you seek
> approval for the take over, you, again, must provide a bugzilla report
> as if it were a new Extras package review. This will allow the normal
> review process to happen. Being how the package is in Extras already,
> this process should be swift."
> 
> If you are not a contributor, you won't have CVS access and so will need
> to go through the sign up, get a sponsor etc procedure. I personally
> would not like to see that circumvented as it adds in that extra layer
> of security.
> 

Though you can get the srpms with out CVS access. You can also get the 
CVS HEAD version from anon CVS checkout. Then the normal review process 
starts.

Thanks!

Michael