[Bug 180066] Request: Inclusion of a ruby template file

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Request: Inclusion of a ruby template file


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180066


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEEDINFO
               Flag|                            |needinfo?




------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2006-07-06 17:51 EST -------
There's a spurious "BuildArchitectures: noarch" line in the new template, I
suppose there are no objections to removing that.  A BuildArch: placeholder is
already there.

I see ruby_sitelib and ruby_sitearch have had "dir" appended to them.  While
cosmetic, I think it would be good to be consistent with the perl and python
precedents in templates and/or macros shipping in the main rpm package; both of
perl and python use *_sitelib and *_sitearch without the trailing "dir".

I've committed to rpmdevtools CVS with those changes, let me know if there are
strong opinions on the *_site*dir macro names and/or if they're "set in stone"
and I'll add those changes too.
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/fedora-rpmdevtools/spectemplate-ruby.spec?root=fedora&rev=.&view=markup

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.