FE-NEW assigned and unassigned (Was Eiciel )

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Andy Burns schrieb:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
>> Agreed -- that's a common problem AFAICS (some bugs were for example
>> accidentally assigned to the default and mostly ignored
>> bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info account).
> 
> Oh, having just looked at the activity and re-assigned the owner to it's
> original, but you're saying that "sink" was never the correct owner anyway?

It's the correct "owner" when the bugzilla-state/the bug is "new", but
no bugs ever should be assigned to it normally. If they are please treat
them as if they were "new".

Cu
thl