Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better

[Callum Lerwick]

On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 15:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>  * Co-Maintainership
> 
>   * This is IMO one of the biggest areas we should work on soon
> 
>   * each package should IMHO have at least two maintainers (one of them
> should be the "primary maintainer", who has the last word if there are
> disagreements how to do things)

This seems like a good purpose for SIGs. The SIG can act as a collective
maintainer/co-maintainer for packages in their areas of interest.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060710/4bb4ed27/attachment.sig>