Question about WTFPL

[Peter Gordon]

� wrote:
> Hi!
> User Ian Chapman on
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 placed a
> review request to package with WTFPL license. And my question is
> simple: is it permissible in Extras?
> More information about it is here: http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/
> 
Well, Bradley Kuhn of the FSF agreed (and laughed) on debian-legal at
one point that this is in fact a valid Free Software license [1], so I'd
say it's probably okay to submit to Extras.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/09/msg00032.html

-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
   DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060722/7d5cc3fd/attachment.sig>