hard time finding packages really for review
Jason L Tibbitts III
tibbs at math.uh.edu
Tue Jul 25 02:10:05 UTC 2006
>>>>> "MT" == Michael Thomas <wart at kobold.org> writes:
MT> IMHO, we need look no further than the 'Assigned To' field.
I don't even see why you would care about that. If the bug blocks
FE-NEW, it's not under review. The only exceptions I can think of are
those that block FE-GUIDELINES, and of course the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bugs
that require a sponsor to do the review.
If someone takes the bug, they should block FE-REVIEW instead to note
that the bug is under review. You'll note that I often ping people to
ensure that they do this. I also regularly go through the old tickets
and try to make something happen.
I pretty much constantly trawl through
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=163776
to find things to work on. That shows dependencies, but you'll also
note that some of the non-child bugs are assigned to folks. Some of
these cases are bugs that were assigned to someone by mistake; it's not
possible to unassign a bug once it's been assigned. Others are simply
improperly blocking FE-NEW when they should be blocking FE-REVIEW.
- J<
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list