rpmlint warnings/errors
Jason L Tibbitts III
tibbs at math.uh.edu
Tue Jun 6 17:46:31 UTC 2006
>>>>> "DHJ" == Daniel H Jones <Daniel> writes:
DHJ> Is it sufficient to provide some explanation of the warning when
DHJ> a package is submitted?
It would help the reviewer if you did so.
DHJ> I have not found a list of acceptable/unacceptable rpmlint
DHJ> issues.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/CommonRpmlintIssues (just
getting started). You're free to add things there. Make sure you run
"rpmlint -i" if you just need additional information about what
rpmlint is complaining about.
DHJ> W: opencryptoki devel-file-in-non-devel-package
DHJ> /usr/lib/libopencryptoki.so
Do you have a versioned .so file there as well
(i.e. libopencryptoki.so.1.2)? If so, this is a blocker.
DHJ> E: opencryptoki non-standard-gid
DHJ> /var/lib/opencryptoki pkcs11
Not a blocker, assuming you properly create that user.
DHJ> W: opencryptoki
DHJ> service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/pkcsslotd
This is a blocker. Packages should not install services which are
turned on by default; otherwise, someone who installs a bunch of
packages ends up with a bunch of enabled services. (Imagine the
theoretical "Everything" install.)
DHJ> W: opencryptoki incoherent-init-script-name pkcsslotd
It helps if the init file is named in such a way that it is associated
with the package, but this is not always reasonable.
- J<
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list