FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
Christian.Iseli at licr.org
Christian.Iseli at licr.org
Mon Jun 12 07:29:12 UTC 2006
michael at knox.net.nz said:
> Should be ignored by the QA script:
> lineak_xosdplugin, lineak_kdeplugins, lineak_xosdplugin Are in the
> owners.list, however the name differs from the subject of the review
> request. Sub the "_" for a "-".
At first, I had a list of BZ tickets for which the script could not determine
the correct package name (file bzId_pkg.txt attached to the
Extras/UsefulScripts wiki page). But I think it was a bad idea: very hard to
maintain. I think the proper way to handle those is to fix the Summary line
of the affected BZ tickets. Which I have done with the lineak* tickets.
> Re-Review is actually jed, which is in the owners.list
Yup. Fixed the script so that it groks this one too.
> kimdaba has been replaced by kphotoalbum, which is in the owners.list
But there still is a kimdaba package with a full devel branch... So
something is wrong somewhere...
> libgsf113 appears to have been removed from cvs, repos and owners.list
This one has been blacklisted now.
Cheers,
Christian
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list