permissions on gdm session files

Peter Gordon peter at thecodergeek.com
Tue Jun 20 00:59:13 UTC 2006


Ville Skytt wrote:
> I'm pretty sure those are plain packaging bugs.
So we should report these as they are found to Bugzilla then?

> Based on a quick look into gdm sources, as expected, it doesn't care
> about the x bits but will just try to open those files for reading.
Excellent. I'll keep Openbox's without the x bit set.

> No it doesn't, the message id is just a bit misleading.  Use the -i or
> -I switches to rpmlint (see the man page) to get the explanation what it
> really thinks.
I've grown quite fond of rpmlint -i` while testing my built
binary/source RPMs. ;)

Thanks.

-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060619/029ee99b/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list