[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Reverting package to a previous



On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 16:52 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "GM" == Gérard Milmeister <gemi bluewin ch> writes:
> 
> GM> Does this mean that a completely new package has to be imported
> GM> into CVS?
> 
> Yes, I would recommend it.  I do not think that you would need to go
> through a separate package review, although I would review your
> package quickly if you did so.
Ok, the bug number is 194300.

> GM> Almost all files reside in %{_libdir}/erlang.  Without patching
> GM> one could use then ${_libdir}/erlang10B/erlang.
> 
> I think that's a bit ugly, especially if .../erlang10B would be empty
> save for that single directory.  I guess it's a balance of this
> ugliness versus the difficulty of patching it.
A simple patch was enough to change from %{_libdir}/erlang to
%{_libdir}/erlangR10B.
-- 
Gérard Milmeister
Langackerstrasse 49
CH-8057 Zürich


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]