Mono Packaging (was Re: On the subject of sponsors...)
Brian Pepple
bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Thu Jun 8 16:21:47 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 08:27 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Another open question would be how this affects us:
> http://www.mono-project.com/Assemblies_and_the_GAC#Libraries_with_Unstable_APIs
>
> It's advocating using .dlls with unstable APIs the same way we normally
> use static libraries (including a local copy with the application). It
> has all the usual features of a static library scheme but fails to
> mention any security issues. Should packages entering Fedora be checked
> to make sure they *do not* follow this or are mono .dlls immune to the
> security concerns with normal static libraries?
I agree this is something that should be decided, before we start
getting more mono apps into Extras.
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060608/378046e5/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list