[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08



Matt Domsch wrote:
Note: This is using the extremely reduced chroot as documented in the Extras
Exception List.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-4cadce5e79d38a63cad3941de1dadc9d25d67d30
automake, autoconf, libtool and m4 had accidentally been included in
my buildroots from previous runs; they're removed in this and
subsequent runs, which will cause additional build failures.

Extras tree as of Thursday afternoon; it takes quite a while to
rebuild 1800 packages on 2 architectures. :-)

In addition, about 5 packages (all perl modules IIRC) managed to hang
in 'make test'.  I manually killed those after ~16 hours, and they'll
show up as failed builds below.

Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE:
gnupg2 194079 NEW
libgpg-error 193550 NEW

Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot as
compared to the standard Fedora Extras build system before FC6test1.  See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more
information, including the list of packages removed from the
default build chroot.

Extras Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Fri Jun  9 23:06:25 CDT 2006
Number failed to build: 206
Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 1
Leaving:  205
(there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)

Of those expected to have worked...
Without a bug filed: 198
----------------------------------
abiword
airsnort
allegro
amaya
argus
azureus
...
I am happy to spend sometime filing extras buildrequires bugs, if the consensus is that is what the community wants ?

DavidT.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]