Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-16
Ville Skyttä
ville.skytta at iki.fi
Sat Jun 17 13:06:36 UTC 2006
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 12:13 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Paul Howarth (paul at city-fan.org) said:
> > buildsys at fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > >azureus:
> > > 5: 0:2.4.0.3-0.20060529cvs_1.fc5
> > > 6: 0:2.4.0.3-0.20060328cvs_5.fc6
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Perhaps the script could be enhanced to take into account packages that
> > have migrated from Core to Extras and vice versa? I know that one of my
> > packages has a broken upgrade path like this.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191686
>
> Heck, I wouldn't mind if you ran it for Core too. :)
Done, the next report will be based on data from FC[456]+updates and
FE[3456]. FC3 is not included because there's no SRPM repodata
available for its updates.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list