[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-16



On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 04:06:36PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 12:13 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Paul Howarth (paul city-fan org) said: 
> > > buildsys fedoraproject org wrote:
> > > >azureus:
> > > >  5: 0:2.4.0.3-0.20060529cvs_1.fc5
> > > >  6: 0:2.4.0.3-0.20060328cvs_5.fc6
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > Perhaps the script could be enhanced to take into account packages that 
> > > have migrated from Core to Extras and vice versa? I know that one of my 
> > > packages has a broken upgrade path like this.
> > > 
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191686
> > 
> > Heck, I wouldn't mind if you ran it for Core too. :)
> 
> Done, the next report will be based on data from FC[456]+updates and
> FE[3456].

Could you add legacy bits, too, e.g. for FC3?

> FC3 is not included because there's no SRPM repodata available for
> its updates.

Maybe the Legacy project has srpm repodata available and if not would
probably be easy to set it up there.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgp84qvohDB9N.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]