[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006



Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:29:31 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote:

Owners file stats:

  - 43 packages not available in extras devel or release

What is this based on?

The same script that was run last time. In fact, last run it was 51, so we might need to check a bit closer whats happening here and ensure that that number is indeed correct. This script is not perfect and with packages moving to core from extras and from extras to core, we will see some oddities.

The list contains many packages which are NOT included anymore on
purpose. Either obsoleted or not needed anymore (and mind you, we don't
have any meta package where to put global obsoletes forever). At least
these need not be put into this report:

[snip]

I can have these black listed.

     wtogami at redhat dot com                  openoffice-extras

Files merged into Core package long ago.

will add to an exclude list.

     davidhart at tqmcube dot com               leafnode

Smells like a AWOL maintainer.

Shall it be orphaned then?

  - 5 packages which have not yet been FE-APPROVE'd...
Openbox Peter Gordon
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=165689,184080

A false positive? This is a resurrection attempt. owners.list only
contains the very old entry from fedora.us era.

Peter recently claimed ownership of this and it is going for a full review.

Thanks!

Michael


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]