[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?

On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 21:41 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 10:27 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > I think the ideal way to handle this is to
> > build only 64-bit on 64-bit, 32-bit on 32-bit, but make the 32-bit
> > packages available in the 64-bit tree as well. At the moment, this isn't
> > possible,
> It ain't pretty, but it's possible from the repo management POV, we
> already do copy i386 Wine packages + some dependencies over to the
> x86_64 repo as part of the signing/pushing process.  See "copydict" at
> http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/extras-buildsys/utils/extras-sign-move.py?root=fedora&rev=.&view=markup

I suppose that would do as a workaround until something more like the ne
algorithm used to determine what should be multilib in core gets
implemented for extras as well...

Jarod Wilson
jwilson redhat com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]