%{_libexecdir}

[Axel Thimm]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 03:23:52PM +0200, Laurent Rineau wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 June 2006 14:37, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 06:56 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > IMO, until an official policy is stated otherwise, in this case, I'd
> > > say
> > > don't worry too much about rpmlint's warning...
> >
> > I'd say take this as official.  libexec is fine, and will continue to be
> > used.  We need to fix rpmlint to accept it.
> 
> On x86_64, should /usr/libexec be 64bits or 32bits?

Treat it like %{_bindir}
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060627/1cf0aeac/attachment.sig>