[Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704


gemi at bluewin.ch changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fed|http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fed
                   |ora/4/i386/SRPMS.gemi/mosml-|ora/4/i386/SRPMS.gemi/mosml-
                   |2.01-3.src.rpm              |2.01-5.src.rpm




------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2006-03-06 18:57 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> The CAML light part of the license says "The user undertakes not to carry out
> any paying distribution of the software." while allowing for cost of
> reproduction. Don't know if this non commercial clause is too restrictive.
It seems that CAML light has been relicensed to QPL and LGPL:
http://caml.inria.fr/caml-light/license.en.html
Would that solve the licensing problem?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.