Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-03-15

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 10:57 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:49:03 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
> > We really should have a FE5 tree without broken deps when FC5 is
> > launched. 
> > 
> > > 	 at-poke    0.2.2-2.i386 
> > Not rebuild, orphaned, seems nothing depends on it afaics so why don't
> > we remove it?
> 
> Tried to contact the packager @redhat multiple times. No response.
> Posted about it to -maintainers list. The right person didn't see
> that either or ignored it deliberately.
> 
> This package was imported and built without an entry in owners.list.
> If that happens more often, maybe we could make the buildsys prohibit
> building packages which don't have a valid owner in owners.list? ;)
IMO, this person has violated the rules of the game ... so he, not the
package, should be facing consequences. 

Ralf