rpms/z88dk/devel z88dk.spec,1.1,1.2

[Paul Howarth]

Paul F. Johnson (pfj) wrote:
> Author: pfj
> 
> Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/z88dk/devel
> In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23212/devel
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	z88dk.spec 
> Log Message:
> auto-import z88dk-1.6-8 on branch devel from z88dk-1.6-8.src.rpm
> 
> 
> Index: z88dk.spec
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/z88dk/devel/z88dk.spec,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
> --- z88dk.spec	13 Jan 2006 00:19:34 -0000	1.1
> +++ z88dk.spec	9 Mar 2006 10:33:10 -0000	1.2
> @@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
>  Summary: A Z80 cross compiler
>  Name: z88dk

...

> +ExcludeArch: x86_64 ia64

...

>  %changelog
> +* Thu Mar 9 2006 Paul F. Johnson <paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk> - 1.6-8
> +- Added ExcludeArch for ia64
> +
>  * Mon Oct 17 2005 Paul F. Johnson <paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk> - 1.6-7
>  - Add ExcludeArch for x86_64 machines

You need to raise a bug on z88dk to track the ExcludeArch and make sure 
it doesn't get forgotten:

See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines

If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an 
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in 
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug 
filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not 
compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be 
placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New 
packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so 
they should put this description in the comment until the package is 
approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation 
with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) 
of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: [179258] 
FE-ExcludeArch-x86, [179259] FE-ExcludeArch-x64, [179260] FE-ExcludeArch-ppc

Paul.