Odd mock build problem
Oliver Andrich
oliver.andrich at gmail.com
Wed Mar 1 20:28:52 UTC 2006
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:18:46PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> So here are some questions:
>
> 1) Where do Ruby packages go?
> Currently it's /usr/lib/site_ruby (or /usr/lib64/site_ruby) under
> which is one directory per Ruby version, and under which is either
> modules or an arch-specific directory where "so"s and "la"s go.
> This is Red Hat's choice of arrangement so I don't think Extras has
> much choice in the matter, but there were some comments to the
> effect that this is a bad idea.
>
> 2) What should Ruby packages require (via Requires:) to make sure Ruby
> installs before them and to bind them to the necessary Ruby ABI
> version?
> Currently we just do the equivalent of Require: /usr/lib/site_ruby
> for noarch packages, and Require: /usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/i386_linux
> for arch-specific packages. (s/lib/lib64/ and s/i386/x86_64/ on
> x86_64; I have no idea what PPC does).
>
> 3) What specfile macros will accomplish #2 given that we can't use the
> Perl and Python trick of calling the interpreter in the specfile to
> define variables.
>
> So, who is able to give some guidance here? Can someone talk to Red
> Hat's Ruby packagers and get their take on this?
As I am highly interested in this, will sum the discussion up and send
it to Akira Tagoh. I will send you a copy before, so we can cross check
if I missed something?
Best regards,
Oliver
--
Oliver Andrich --- oliver.andrich at gmail.com --- http://roughbook.de/
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list