[Bug 182064] Review Request: facter

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: facter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182064





------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com  2006-03-06 14:54 EST -------
* I uppdated the spec/srpm and made changes according to the comments above

* The only thing I did not change is the install location: upstream ruby does
not provide a real distinction between vendor and site install locations.
Python, which is in a similar situation, uses site-packages for both rpm and
local installs. We are trying (as part of the Ruby SIG) to get this rectified,
but in the meantime I would like to stick with site_ruby

Spec: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/facter.spec
SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/facter-1.1.4-1.src.rpm



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.