non fedora-usermgmt user creation

[Enrico Scholz]

ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville Skyttä) writes:

>> >> | %pre
>> >> | if test -x /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd; then
>> >> |    /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd ...
>> >> | else
>> >> |    /usr/sbin/useradd ...
>> >> | fi
>> 
>> Sorry, that's a point where I insist on: when a Fedora Extras package
>> uses fedora-usermgmt, then it MUST have the corresponding 'Requires(...):
>> fedora-usermgmt'.
>
> So what is the point of the "if" condition you suggested above then?

Yes, you are right. It would be wrong to do the decision whether to call
'fedora-usermgmt' or plain 'useradd' at installation-time.

The decision whether to use 'Requires: fedora-usermgmt' or not, happens
at rpmbuild-time. At this time, the %scriptlets should be filled with
either 'fedora-useradd' or 'useradd'.




Enrico
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060308/3e238af6/attachment.sig>