[Bug 182743] Review Request: nessus-libraries
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 14 01:32:15 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nessus-libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182743
jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-03-13 20:32 EST -------
Oh, I assumed the opposite for --disble-nessuspcap
Nope.
Good:
- rpmlint checks return:
* no-version-in-last-changelog, ignoring, long lines
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files
- post/postun ldconfig ok
- devel requires base package n-v-r
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list