[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 16 21:32:21 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530
------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-03-16 16:32 EST -------
OK, I've resolved each of the issues raised:
> - I can't find any evidence of license terms under which this package can be
> distributed, which would be a blocker and in need of fixing upstream
The rpm has always had tag:
'License: distributable
'
and there are no license restrictions or copyright in any source file
or on the package CPAN home-page. As perl-RPM2 is already distributed
in every Fedora Core and RHEL release except FC-5, these terms are
evidently acceptable.
> - Extras packages shouldn't have a buildreq on perl
This package cannot be built without the perl package being
installed; hence, the 'BuildRequires: perl' tag.
> - latest changelog release tag doesn't match actual release tag
huh? The %{version}-%{release} is 0.66-12 - latest changelog:
* Thu Mar 08 2006 Jason Vas Dias <jvdias at redhat.com> - 0.66-12
> - some of the tests fail but "make check" passes - why?
Because the package was not being built as root.
Now, all tests that require root access are skipped if being run by a non-root
user, so all tests pass as a non-root user; I've also tested that those tests
are run and pass if run by root.
> - missing buildreqs elfutils-libelf-devel and bzip2-devel
Added.
> - using find/filelist method for %files results in unowned directory
> %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/RPM2
I've added:
%dir %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/RPM2
to %files list.
>- consider adding %{?dist} tag if this package is likely to be needed for
> future Fedora releases
Added.
Modified .spec file and srpm at:
http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/perl-RPM2.spec
http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/perl-RPM2-0.66-12.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list