[Bug 185498] Review Request: gjots2

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gjots2


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185498





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2006-03-17 07:53 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I've fixed some of those issues, see
> 
> http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/gjots2/gjots2-2.3.4-2.src.rpm
> 
> but there are still 2 remaining, which I'm not sure how to fix
> 
> E: gjots2 no-binary
> E: gjots2 only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> 
> does it apply on python? 

Yes. Usually these would go under %{python_sitelib}, which rpmlint wouldn't
complain about.

And the usual fix for the "script without shellbang" issue would be to remove
the execute bit from the .py files rather than adding shellbangs. This is
because the python modules are imported by the scripts you do actually execute
(in %{_bindir}) and they don't need to be executable for that.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.