[Bug 185847] Review Request: deutex - Doom wad manipulator
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Mar 19 20:59:50 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: deutex - Doom wad manipulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185847
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-03-19 15:59 EST -------
Answering my own question, yes it is :)
MUST
====
* rpmlint output clean except for:
W: deutex invalid-license GPL-Compatible
W: deutex invalid-license GPL-Compatible
W: deutex-debuginfo invalid-license GPL-Compatible
This is ok essentially deutex is GPL, but some source-files bear a different
GPL compatible license.
* Package named correctly
* GPL (+compatible) license OK.
* spec file legible, in Am. English
* Source matches upstream
* Successfully compiles and builds on at least one platform (FC-5 x86_64)
* no locale data, shared libraries, or static libraries
* No excessive Requires: or BR:
* Summary and description ok
* macro use consistent
* Does not create any directories
* Not relocatable
* %doc does not affect runtime
* File permissions ok
Approved (now that went smoothly!)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list