Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report

[seth vidal]

On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 20:30 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 21.03.2006, 14:09 -0500 schrieb seth vidal:
> > On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 20:03 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 21.03.2006, 10:36 -0500 schrieb
> > > buildsys at fedoraproject.org:
> > > 
> > > > liboil-0.3.7.1-1.fc5
> > > 
> > > We just broke the "Extras packages should not obsolete or update
> > > packages from Core" rule. liboil is in FC5, it never should have been
> > > build or pushed for FE5.
> > > 
> > > Well, bad things happen. How to proceed? How to make sure something like
> > > this does not happen again?
> > > 
> > 
> > is it possible someone put it in core for fc5 and didn't check if it was
> > already in extras?
> 
> No, it an older version of the extras package that was moved to Core ;-)
> 
> http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/liboil/liboil.spec?rev=1.5&view=markup
> 

which means that the core maintainer is at a fault for not notifying the
extras maintainer it was moved.

looks like the culprit is Warren.

-sv