[Bug 172140] Review Request: libmal: a convenience library for malsync

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 21 22:46:36 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libmal: a convenience library for malsync


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172140


jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2006-03-21 17:46 EST -------
Oh, the license is included. Never mind about that.

- rpmlint checks return:
W: libmal summary-not-capitalized a convenience library for malsync
W: libmal summary-not-capitalized a convenience library for malsync
E: libmal zero-length /usr/share/doc/libmal-0.31/TODO
E: libmal zero-length /usr/share/doc/libmal-0.31/NEWS
E: libmal zero-length /usr/share/doc/libmal-0.31/AUTHORS
W: libmal-debuginfo objdump-failed
E: libmal-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

Capitalize summary and remove empty files. for devel package,
only-non-binary-in-usr-lib, it's a symlink, ignore.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (MPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file

- devel package ok
- no .la files
- post/postun ldconfig ok
- devel requires base package n-v-r 

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list