Mono apps in extras
Linus Walleij
triad at df.lth.se
Sun Mar 26 19:29:20 UTC 2006
Looking back at the recently announced OIN initiative, in retrospect, what
I claimed was NotTrue(TM) proved to be TheTruth(TM), down to the
individual company names. This was an educated guess (really, Greg I hope
you didn't fall over each other trying to figure out how this guy in
Sweden could know what you were doing) so if anyone is looking for an OS
business analyst... :-)
(OIN, Greg spills the beans on Mono: http://gregdek.livejournal.com/4008.html)
Linus
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
>
>> If and when I can say more, I assure you that I will.
>
> Cool now you sound like a federal comission :-)
>
> That statement alone indeed confirms that it is a hot potato.
>
> In absence of statements we can happily start speculating which will in turn
> generate rumors. Here is my first RockingSpeculation(TM) which is certainly
> NotTrue(TM): RedHat has struck a deal of sorts with /insert big company name
> here/ that their lawyers shall go after Microsoft for all their patents they
> break in case Microsoft sue Red Hat or the Fedora foundation for any patent
> infringements.
>
> /big company/ could be for example Novell since they sort of make Mono, or
> could even be IBM. Both hold many patents dangerous to Microsoft.
>
> Linus
>
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list