Packages guidelines: documentation subpackages name
Ville Skyttä
ville.skytta at iki.fi
Sun May 14 15:33:23 UTC 2006
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 17:12 +0200, Laurent Rineau wrote:
> At http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation we
> can read "it is recommended to use *-doc as the subpackage name", whereas in
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines we can read
> "- MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -docs subpackage."
>
> So, could we agree on one policy? FC and FE seem to mix the two styles of
> naming. Looking at /var/cache/yum/{core,extras}/primary.xml.gz, if found in
> fe5:
> 30 "-doc"
> 19 "-docs"
> and in fc5:
> 16 "-doc"
> 5 "-docs"
+1 to -doc.
There's also -manual which could fall into the same category and
packaged just as -doc. Someone will probably argue that -doc should be
reserved for subpackages and -manual for ones that are built from their
own SRPM, I'll say in advance that I disagree and the user doesn't
care :)
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list