Packaging guidelines: buildroot
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Wed May 17 21:04:41 UTC 2006
Axel Thimm (Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net) said:
> Makes sense, it will make an end to the fantasy of BuildRoot name
> inventes (like adding the uid ...).
>
> But what happens when a package has no BuildRoot and neither does a
> macro for it exist? Would it potentially eat the user's home?
rpmbuild: Fatal, no build root defined
(I doubt it does this now...)
Bill
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list