rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Thu May 18 13:51:31 UTC 2006
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Next message (by thread): rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 06:37 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> I don't know about qt4 - but I thought that at some point, there was a
> policy that allowed stuff moving from core to extras to be done without
> needing a proper review, which would be the case with koffice.
>
Absolutely not. This was a common assumption that was flat wrong. Core
package quality isn't even close to Extras in a lot of cases. ALL new
packages to Extras (new as in never in Extras before) need to go through
a review process. Said review process could be the same one that was
done to get a new package into FC6+, just reference that review when
filing the review bug.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060518/6cba7d8f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Next message (by thread): rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list