[Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE

[Rex Dieter]

Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> OK, FESCO unfortunatley didn't actually seem to reach any kind of
> decision on this. So, I have updated the spec to call the package
> emacs-muse, with subpackages of xemacs-muse, emacs-muse-common,
> emacs-muse-el and xemacs-muse-el. this is a bit unilateral, but I
> figured doing something is better than nothing.
> 
> I have also added Obsoletes: muse and Provides: muse to the
> muse-common subpackage.
> 
> I'm all ready to go, but I don't know what the best way to proceed is
> - shall I import this as a new package into cvs (since the package
> name is now different) and request the old package is deleted? (surely
> this won't have to go through the review process again?)

Yep, no, respectively.

Not sure of the wisdom of the Obsoltes/Provides: muse, since part of the 
point of this discussion was the name collision with something else 
named muse.

-- Rex