[Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 20:54 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 18/05/06, Kevin Fenzi <kevin-fedora-extras at scrye.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > Jonathan> OK, FESCO unfortunatley didn't actually seem to reach any
> > Jonathan> kind of decision on this.
> >
> > Yes, they did in the meeting just this morning...
> >
> 
> [snip of proceedings]
> 
> OK, I looked at the time indicated at the top of Thorstens summary and
> missed the main part. However, you will notice that further down there
> are votes in favour of emacs-common. So I don't really think a
> decision was reached.
> 
If you're looking at the Summary email, you're looking at the minutes
from last week's meeting.  Emacs-muse was one of the first things
discussed today.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060518/b28c6321/attachment.sig>