FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed

Brian Pepple bdpepple at ameritech.net
Thu May 4 13:52:21 UTC 2006


On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 15:39 +0200, Laurent Rineau wrote:
> On Thursday 04 May 2006 15:05, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > Bug #190396 - netpanzer
> >
> > At any rate - the bug should probably block the NEEDS-SPONSOR bug, to
> > make it easier for potential sponsors to find.
> 
> I have the same problem: I am the author of the following review request:
>   Bug #190070 – Review Request: par2cmdline
> 
> The day after the creation of the request, it has been accepted, and added to 
> blockers of FE-ACCEPT.
> 
> However, it was my first submission, and I tell that in the description of the 
> request. I added FE-NEEDSSPONSOR to blockers of my request, the day after, a 
> week ago. I suppose that my request awaits another review of a sponsor, so 
> that I am sponsored.
> 
> Perhaps my request #190070 should no longer block FE-NEEDSSPONSOR. Please tell 
> me.
> 

Personally, that bug should probably remain FE-NEEDSSPONSOR, and not be
FE-ACCEPT, since it sounds like the person that approved your package
cannot sponsor new contributors.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bdpepple at ameritech.net>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060504/6f942972/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list