[Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Am Donnerstag, den 18.05.2006, 20:33 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Underwood:
> OK, FESCO unfortunatley didn't actually seem to reach any kind of
> decision on this.

Why do you think so? Here is the relevant part from yesterdays meeting
(it was the first topic; the summary I send out yesterday was from
*last* weeks meeting)

> 19:02            --- | thl has changed the topic to: FESCo Meeting in progess -- emacs-muse
> 19:02              * | bpepple lurking about.
> 19:02 <         thl> | {x,}emacs-muse, emacs-comon-muse or emacsen-muse ?
> 19:02 <         thl> | do we want to discuss this without spot?
> 19:02              * | spot is here
> 19:02 <    XulChris> | +1 emacs-common-muse
> 19:02              * | nirik likes 'emacsen-muse', but it doesn't really matter that much I guess. 
> 19:03 <         thl> | +1 emacs-common-muse
> 19:03 <        spot> | there is no precent for making up words like emacsen in the guidelines to date
> 19:03 <         thl> | spot, what's you current solution?
> 19:03 <        spot> | and i would prefer not to start anything. :)
> 19:03 <   mschwendt> | +1 emacs-common-muse
> 19:03 <       nirik> | spot: fair enough. 
> 19:03 <        spot> | emacs-common-foo is my vote
> 19:03 <    XulChris> | +∞ emacs-common-muse
> 19:03 <     bpepple> | +1 emacs-common-muse
> 19:03 <        spot> | precedent
> 19:04 <         thl> | k, seems this one one easy
> 19:04 <       nirik> | ok, so muse, mew, and emacs-autex have to change... 
> 19:04 <         thl> | spot, can you mail that to the list and put it in the packaging guidelines please?
> 19:04 <        spot> | gladly.
> 19:04            --> | thomasvs (Thomas Vander Stichele) [n=thomas at fedora/thomasvs] has joined #fedora-extras
> 19:04              * | nirik can go review vm now too. ;) 
> 19:04 <         thl> | spot, thx

CU
thl