scientific license - fedora compatible?
Callum Lerwick
seg at haxxed.com
Tue May 23 05:57:56 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 02:01 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> * they are opposed to forks and free redistribution, they want to be
> acknowledged for the work and also keep control on it. That also goes
> against free software.
That sounds like the very definition of proprietary software to me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060523/434faf5d/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list