scientific license - fedora compatible?

[Paul Howarth]

Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:57:56AM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
>> On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 02:01 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>>> * they are opposed to forks and free redistribution, they want to be 
>>>   acknowledged for the work and also keep control on it. That also goes 
>>>   against free software.
>> That sounds like the very definition of proprietary software to me.
> 
> No, because the source is given freely to you and you can modify it as you
> like. The restriction is that the source of the software cannot change.

So you can't fix security bugs then?

Paul.