scientific license - fedora compatible?

[Jonathan Underwood]

On 23/05/06, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> wrote:
> Which brings us the a point which we have been over and over again. We
> could really use a Non Free or Non Commercial repo for stuff like this,
> I know we have the repo which may not be named, but the may not be named
> is exactly the problem, if we want to cater as wide an audience as
> possible (and IMHO we do) we could really use a Non Commercial repo.

It would be nice. The unmentionable repo does not operate in the same
way as FE, as far as I can tell - it would be really nice to have a
repo for non-commercial stuff not allowed in extras, let's called it
Luvna, which uses the same infrastructure as FE, and which is open to
contributors.

j.