scientific license - fedora compatible?
Jonathan Underwood
jonathan.underwood at gmail.com
Tue May 23 16:01:24 UTC 2006
On 23/05/06, Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:
> That's strange. It seems to me that this practice is explicitly taken into
> account in the point 4. at
> http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php
>
> Accordingly, an open-source license must guarantee that source be
> readily available, but may require that it be distributed as pristine
> base sources plus patches. In this way, "unofficial" changes can be
> made available but readily distinguished from the base source.
Indeed. Seems the wikipedia entry is off beam.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list