Question about "shlib-with-non-pic-code", possibly caused by assembler code?

[Hans de Goede]

Orion Poplawski wrote:
> In the meantime, should this be a blocker against pari being accepted
> into extras?
> 

Non PIC .so's break with SELinux (targeted) being enabled. There is a
work around though, checkout Glide3 in cvs, there is some magick in the
specfile to fix the SELinux issues.

This is not the preferred way to handle this though.

Regards,

Hans