Bug in agrep (x86_64); no bugzilla category

Michael Schwendt bugs.michael at gmx.net
Tue Nov 21 12:08:02 UTC 2006


On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:17:53 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:

> > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:19:15 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >
> > > On Tuesday, 21 November 2006 at 10:35, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:20:13 +0100, David Jansen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I found a bug in agrep, FC5 x86_64 version, it produces different results
> > > > > than the same invocation on i686 on the same plain text file.
> > > > > However, agrep is not listed in the bugzilla components of Fedora
> > > > > Extras.
> > > >
> > > > agrep is not in Fedora Extras.
> > >
> > > Of course it is. Look at what SRPM it is built from. ;)
> >
> > So?
> >
> 
> I think he is referring to the "tre" SRPM package: however, I'm not
> sure what's the command to determine from what SRPM a given RPM is
> built from...

Aha, that's not the original and famous http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrep
which has an incompatible license.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list