Bug in agrep (x86_64); no bugzilla category

[Mamoru Tasaka]

Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On 11/21/06, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:19:15 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>>
>> > On Tuesday, 21 November 2006 at 10:35, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:20:13 +0100, David Jansen wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I found a bug in agrep, FC5 x86_64 version, 
>> > >
>> > > agrep is not in Fedora Extras.
>> >
>> > Of course it is. Look at what SRPM it is built from. ;)
>>
>> So?
> I think he is referring to the "tre" SRPM package: however, I'm not
> sure what's the command to determine from what SRPM a given RPM is
> built from...
> 
As Gianluca said, agrep is rebuilt from tre, so a bug report should
be filed against tre component (if any). You can simply check the original
srpm by 'rpm -qi agrep'.

Mamoru Tasaka