New Comps Groups

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le lundi 27 novembre 2006 à 15:57 -0500, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net) said: 
> > > I'm in agreement with Bill on this.  Pretty much all the python-*
> > > packages should be pulled in as dependencies.  Am I missing something
> > > here?
> > 
> > It's pretty much impossible to autodetect missing comps entries unless
> > every package is systematically put in comps. No autochecking means low
> > QA.
> 
> What constitutes 'missing'? Just something that should be selectable but
> isn't there? I would hope that those sorts of things would become apparent.

A new package which has not been classified at all (ie the contributor
"forgot" to think about comps at all)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20061127/9637c360/attachment.sig>